Firefly, Clapham Common - pub details
[image 2] |
Address: 69, Clapham Common South Side, London, SW4 9DA [map] [gmap]
Tel: 0871 951 1000 (ref 5010) - calls cost 10p per minute plus network extras
Clapham Common (0.4 miles), Clapham South (0.4 miles), Clapham North (0.8 miles)
Clapham High Street (0.7 miles), Wandsworth Road (1.1 miles), Balham (1.1 miles)
Are you the Licensee? Click here. ** SPECIAL Royal Summer Sizzler offer! **
other pubs nearby:
Windmill on the Common, Clapham Common (0.1 miles), Abbeville, Clapham South (0.2 miles), Gigalum, Clapham South (0.3 miles), Jolly Gardeners, Clapham (0.4 miles), B@1, Clapham (0.4 miles) - see more nearby pubs
user reviews of Firefly, Clapham Common
please note - reviews on this site are purely the opinion of site visitors, so don't take them too seriously.
5 most recent reviews of 14 shown - see all reviews
Now called the Rookery. Has one hand pump but otherwise it's craft beers at £5 a pop. On weekends it seems that you'll be lucky to get a seat unless you've booked for food. All that aside, I actually quite enjoyed spending a few hours here a couple of Saturdays ago. plymouthpirate - 4 Apr 2014 13:14 |
Went to Firefly on Saturday evening. We had a great time. We had been in the Abbeville, down the road, but left because the staff were so unpleasant. Firefly was a different story and we had a great time. The staff were excellent and we stayed until the bitter end! hs97jhs - 20 Apr 2009 12:56 |
Good bar. Friendly staff. Decent selection of lagers, and menu is good and reasonably priced. King_Pubby - 18 Apr 2007 21:35 |
Great laid back bar with a very non pretentious style. Fairly decent grub served by some very pretty staff!! Girls and boys!! Had a great night there recently on a bank holiday when the whole place was dancing to some great music, as opposed to the usual 3 hours of 'FUNKY HOUSE' which seems to be the norm these days. Also a top place when the sun comes out. anonymous - 23 Sep 2006 11:09 |
The below comment about the outside area and tobacco firm is false, the way the newspaper in question wrote the comments are misleading. anonymous - 28 Apr 2006 16:17 |
see more reviews |