The Edmund Tylney, Leatherhead

Ooh ouchy, Surrey Yokel really is very protective against such a dump. Food edible? Obviously this person has not eaten real food other than the sort of ready meals that JDW serve up! How sad!! Who is the chef in this place is it Gordon Ramsey? For his info the lady who he seems to have such a vendetta against was not a regular but was chatting to an acquaintance and seated at a table whilst her husband had popped to the toilet. A few minutes later to then be glassed and attacked by a large group who were part of a well known local violent family, the victim having never heard of them, let alone met them!

The husband then returned to find his wife covered in blood due to a ruptured artery!

So not really worth a further visit. Wonder how SY would feel if he found himself in this position? This pub will never change and has had a high number of other violent incidents that have taken place in this pub. Freedom of Information from Surrey Police records tells all one needs to know about what really goes on in this hovel that resembles a wild west saloon! This is a real pub review. No good having cheap pint and grub if you then have to leave the place in an ambulance! Shut up Surrey Yokel and leave others to speak the truth about this place!

28 Apr 2012 13:08

The Edmund Tylney, Leatherhead

Ha, ha, ha! Hilarious! Pot kettle black. Two great rants from two of the typical sort of low mentality type that frequent this hell hole. Grumpy and Surrey Yokel are probably in here everyday spending the housekeeping or their benefits! These two are probably the same bloke, is possibly one of the attackers or someone involved in the cover up! Can't wait can he! Surrey Y almost reaches orgasmic highs in order to prevent the truth about what happened to the lady victim on 9.2.07. So what, the way it was written is irrelevant. It was expected that it would only be a matter of time before the bully Surrey Yokel would rant against democracy! Go sup or snort whatever you go to this pub for (but try not to attack ladies)!

25 Jan 2012 13:59

The Edmund Tylney, Leatherhead

Hello Surrey Yokel! Thought you wiuld be interested that I had dinner recently with the victim of that dreadful attack (she is such a lovely lady) and her wonderful husband. I am a part-time writer and I was given the privilege of having access to a large amount of paperwork the victim has on the whole disgraceful event. I always thought that people in this place were dodgy, but WOW what a cover up of lies against such a decent couple. All very interesting stuff, especially the petition (which the victim's solicitor had, as the Council conveniently lost it after that Review - but it was disregarded anyway as it was not legal). Oh, expect you never realised that the Review was the victim's own Review. I was surprised to see so many signatures that were all in the same handwriting and hardly anyone could write (apart from one or two). The reason is that as it is 5 years since this all happened and certain assailants who attacked the victim are still in the area and did not face the Courts I am thinking of writing a book on this cover up. So I expect you saw what happened Surrey Yokel but like the off duty staff who rubbished and told lies about a totally innocent victim who suffered a life long appalling head injury, I wondered if you all received your 30 pieces of silver? The then manager was obviously running some sort of racket (not tennis)! The off duty staff even rubbished the victim's injuries and lied about the victim's husband and even made adverse comments about other family of the victim. (How stupid were they)! The victim is a decent lady, far far more intelligent than they and the attackers and the dimwits who signed the Petition.! Thought you would like to know Surrey Yokel. I see that the security arrangments on Sats are not that good, no bouncers on the door, I thought there was supposed to be one on the door on Sats. Oh, the victim and her husband said they were insulted by some local bloke, who they only know as an acquaintance, asked if they were going in the Tylney again! What a thing to ask, they would not want to give this appalling pub chain a penny of their hard earned money (they are both decent hard working people - the victim has a really great career and her husband too), they would also not want to drink alongside such ghastly locals, most of whom are old soaks, alcoholics and utterly boring! Oh, by the way, it is the oldest trick in the book to say that an attack on a lone person (in this case a woman) can be twisted to make it look like a fight. The victim is a lovely, beautiful person and very brave and of a much older generation than the attackers and the off duty staff (do they still work at the pub, those girls who appeared to have swapped places with each other and lied), and the cowards who refused to tell the truth to save their own necks from the shit family clan who formed the attack on this lady and who have attacked others too. Oh, by the way the husband does not drink Jack Daniels. So all in all I have read the statements supplied to the then review slagging off the victim and her husband, the petition with its ludicrous signatures, the lies about such a lovely victim and her husband, it all makes interesting reading! Does this pub still have a DON'T DO DRUNK policy, or is it DON'T DO DRUGS policy. Wonder if that was why they all covered up! Thanks for reading this SY, don't take lovely ladies in this Wild West saloon!

19 Jan 2012 09:48